Stakeholder Feedback Policy and Procedure

Purpose and Scope

The purpose of this Policy is to provide a framework for obtaining,summarizing and documenting information on student and stakeholder perceptions of the quality and effectiveness of the Institute’s curriculum for use in program evaluation, accreditation and other academic quality assurance processes and activities. The scope of this Policy covers all the programs run by AISSMS College of Engineering, Pune .

Specifically, this Policy provides a framework for:

  1. Monitoring and improving the quality of students’ learning experiences through the timely collection, analysis and reporting of student feedback concerning teaching, learning and assessment;
  2. Providing students and stakeholders with the opportunity to actively participate in the continual improvement of programs.
  3. Recognizing, documenting, supporting and extending good practices for effective implementations of curriculum provided by affiliating University;
  4. Ensuring the provision of information to students and stakeholders regarding the consideration of feedback collected over time, including actions taken to address concerns raised in any feedback received.


  • The Academic Coordinator and the Administrative officer are jointly responsible for the collection, analysis and reporting of stakeholder feedback relating to academic programs.
  • Coordination of responses to feedback will be the responsibility of the Heads of Departments.

Policy Provisions

General Provisions

  • All students and stakeholders have the opportunity to provide feedback
  • Student feedback is a core component of program evaluation but feedback is also sought from Alumni, Graduates, Parents, Industry partners and Academic peers
  • Feedback processes will be systematic, rigorous and respectful of the rights of students and staff; and will incorporate strategies to maximise student participation.
  • A range of feedback mechanisms including surveys, focus groups, informal comments and other participatory activities will be employed as appropriate.

Collecting Feedback:

  • The Institute seeks student feedback in a form which can be captured, analyzed and reported every time a course is delivered through course-end survey.
  • A core set of questions will form the basis of a survey deployed to systematically evaluate teaching and learning in all UG & PG courses.
  • Stakeholder feedback will be collected as required for specific purposes using methods appropriate for the specific feedback sought.


Actions on summarized feedback:

  • All the feedbacks received from various stakeholders are summarized and analysis is carried out at department level.
  • Recommendations made from the feedback comprise, recommendations to Board of studies for changes in the syllabus of the university and the suggestions made to management on procurement of facilities and equipments.
  • Recommendations received from the heads are discussed in ADC meeting and forwarded to management for approval/sanctions.

The whole objective of the this policy is effective implementation of Curriculum for better learning and continuous improvement of the processes and practices

We are interested to hear about your feedback and get valuable suggestions to make our Programme better.

A. Please indicate (tick) your level of satisfaction:
Substantial (High) -3 Moderate (Medium) -2 Slight (Low) - 1

Sr. No. Particulars Indicators
1 Benefits of fundamental knowledge gained in professional life SubstantialModerateSlight
2 Effectiveness of Practical exposure in professional life SubstantialModerateSlight
3 Impact of inputs to overall grooming and personality development SubstantialModerateSlight
4 Motivation to lifelong learning SubstantialModerateSlight
5 Ability gained to serve the Society SubstantialModerateSlight
B. Please indicate (tick) the areas in which you can contribute to Department / College
R & D activitiesStudent & Faculty Development ProgramExpert Lecture/Training programs for studentsLaboratory DevelopmentTraining & PlacementLearning Resource DevelopmentAny other
B. Please provide following information

Strength of the Programme Opportunities for Improvement with reference to part A
Personal details Professional details
A. Please indicate (tick) your level of satisfaction:

Substantial (High) -3 Moderate (Medium) -2 Slight (Low) - 1

Sr. No. Particulars Indicators
1 Technical Competency SubstantialModerateSlight
2 Leadership & Professional Ethics SubstantialModerateSlight
3 Self Motivation SubstantialModerateSlight
4 Proficiency in Soft skills SubstantialModerateSlight
5 Innovative ideas generation SubstantialModerateSlight
B. Please provide following information

Strength of the Programme Opportunities for Improvement with reference to part A
C. Have you visited our Institute? If yes, what was your overall impression of the Institute, describe.
Name of the Faculty :
Email Id
Year/ Sem: Designation: Department:

PART A : Curriculum implementation

Please mention about the subjects/ courses you teach

What curriculum gaps you identified in the present syllabus of the University.

Would you like to suggest any changes in the syllabus to BOS of the university?

Do you suggest any value addition to Institute / Department for better student learning

How can we develop a better industry-Department interaction, how do you define your

Suggest a innovative teaching method for effective learning that yielded result.

PART B : Overall rating

Sr No Particulars Very good Good Average Poor
1 Campus Environment Very good Good Average Poor
2 Canteen facility Very good Good Average Poor
3 Interaction with administration Very good Good Average Poor
4 Internet  Facilities Very good Good Average Poor
5 Computer facilities Very good Good Average Poor
6 Recreational facilities Very good Good Average Poor
7 Co-curricular & Extra-curricular activities Very good Good Average Poor
8 Sports facilities Very good Good Average Poor
9 Laboratory facilities Very good Good Average Poor
10 Examination System Very good Good Average Poor
11 Discipline Very good Good Average Poor
12 Support for faculty development Very good Good Average Poor

Details of the Ward Details of Father/Mother/Guardian
Name: Name:
Class: Profession & Qualification:
Branch/Department: Residential address:
Contact no. Contact no.
Email: Email:
Sr.No Particulars Your opinion
1 Getting admission in AISSMS COE  for my ward is a matter of pride for me. AgreePartly agreeDonot agreeNeutral
2 My ward is improving his knowledge base through interaction with professors of this  Institute AgreePartly agreeDonot agreeNeutral
3 The curriculum of the course is well designed and promotes learning experience of the students AgreePartly agreeDonot agreeNeutral
4 Employability is given focus in the curriculum design. AgreePartly agreeDonot agreeNeutral
5  Infrastructural facilities in the institute  are adequate AgreePartly agreeDonot agreeNeutral
6 The atmosphere in the University is conducive for learning. AgreePartly agreeDonot agreeNeutral
7 AISSMS COE website is very informative & regularly updated. AgreePartly agreeDonot agreeNeutral
Have you visited the College / Department to know the progress of your ward? IF Yes, Whom you met?

Name the faculty member
Please write on the strength of the Department /Institute

Your suggestions

Name :
Email :
Department :


Sr. No Particulars Your opinion
Agree Partly agree Do not agree Neutral
1 Learning value in terms of skills, concepts, knowledge, analytical abilities, or broadening perspectives Agree Partly agree Do not agree Neutral
2 Applicability/relevance to real life situations Agree Partly agree Do not agree Neutral
3 Depth of the course content and extent of coverage of course Agree Partly agree Do not agree Neutral
4 Extent of effort required by students Agree Partly agree Do not agree Neutral
5 The syllabus was adequate and relevant Agree Partly agree Do not agree Neutral


1) How do you rate the student-teacher relationship in the Institute/Department as a whole?
Very goodGoodSatisfactoryPoor
2) How do you find the Institute’s administrative office?
3) Did you participate in any of the extracurricular / Cocurrricular activities of the Department / Institute?

4) What was the attitude of teachers to extra-curricular activities?
co-operativeindifferentdiscouragingDo not know

5) After leaving the University how will you talk about it?